The paper opens with the brief facts and judgement of Campbell v. Acuff-Rose
Music, Inc. The case is vital to introduce copyright law and its extension to
parodies. The author has divided the paper into five parts, inclusive of the
introduction and conclusion. The first part lays the foundation for the paper. The
second part deals with copyright protection and gives a detailed analysis of its
requirements – originality of works and expression of thoughts. In the third part,
the author has provided an insight into one of the defences of copyright
infringement. This part focuses on both fair use, as is prevalent in the United
States, and the doctrine of fair dealing that is followed in the United Kingdom and
India. The author elaborates upon the four factors of fair use. The fourth part
looks at parodies and gives a justification about why they are protected from the
accusation of infringement. In this part, the author has also distinguished between
parodies and satire. The author hopes that the paper will provide clarity of
concept, and promises not to file a suit in case a parody is made.
The entire paper is available here -
http://e-journal.nuals.ac.in/PDFFiles/70CopyrightProtectionanditsRelationtoParodies.pdf
The entire paper is available here -
http://e-journal.nuals.ac.in/PDFFiles/70CopyrightProtectionanditsRelationtoParodies.pdf